When developing HTTP APIs, providing consistent and informative error responses is crucial for a smooth developer experience. Problem Details in ASP.NET Core offers a standardized solution to this challenge, ensuring your APIs communicate errors effectively and uniformly.
In this article, we'll explore the latest developments in Problem Details, including:
The new RFC 9457 that refines the Problem Details standard
Using the .NET 8
IExceptionHandler
for global exception handlingUsing the
IProblemDetailsService
for customizing Problem Details
Let's dive into these features and see how they can improve your API's error handling.
Understanding Problem Details
Problem Details is a machine-readable format for specifying errors in HTTP API responses. HTTP status codes don't always contain enough details about errors to be helpful. The Problem Details specification defines a JSON (and XML) document format to describe problems.
Probme Details includes:
type
: A URI reference that identifies the problem typetitle
: A short, human-readable summary of the problem typestatus
: The HTTP status codedetail
: A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the probleminstance
: A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem
RFC 9457, which replaces RFC 7807, introduces improvements such as clarifying the use of the type field and providing guidelines for extending Problem Details.
Here's an example Problem Details response:
Content-Type: application/problem+json
{
"type": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc9110#section-15.5.5",
"title": "Not Found",
"status": 404,
"detail": "The habit with the specified identifier was not found",
"instance": "PUT /api/habits/aadcad3f-8dc8-443d-be44-3d99893ba18a"
}
Implementing Problem Details
Let's see how to implement Problem Details in ASP.NET Core. We want to return a Problem Details response for unhandled exceptions. By calling AddProblemDetails
, we're configuring the application to use the Problem Details format for failed requests. With UseExceptionHandler
, we introduce an exception handling middleware to the request pipeline. By adding UseStatusCodePages
, we're introducing a middleware that will convert error responses with an empty body to a Problem Details response.
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
// Adds services for using Problem Details format
builder.Services.AddProblemDetails();
var app = builder.Build();
// Converts unhandled exceptions into Problem Details responses
app.UseExceptionHandler();
// Returns the Problem Details response for (empty) non-successful responses
app.UseStatusCodePages();
app.Run();
When we encounter an unhandled exception, it will be translated to a Problem Details response:
Content-Type: application/problem+json
{
"type": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc9110#section-15.6.1",
"title": "An error occurred while processing your request.",
"status": 500
}
Now, let's explore how we can customize this response.
Global Error Handling
We have a few options for implementing global error handling. The most popular approach is creating a custom exception handling middleware. You wrap the API request in a try-catch
statement and return a response based on any caught exception.
With .NET 8, we can use the IExceptionHandler
that runs in the built-in exception handling middleware. This handler allows you to tailor the Problem Details response for specific exceptions. Returning true
from the TryHandleAsync
method short-circuits the pipeline and returns the API response. If we return false
, the next handler in the chain attempts to handle the exception.
We can map different exception types to appropriate HTTP status codes, providing more precise error information to API consumers.
Here's an example CustomExceptionHandler
implementation:
internal sealed class CustomExceptionHandler : IExceptionHandler
{
public async ValueTask<bool> TryHandleAsync(
HttpContext httpContext,
Exception exception,
CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
int status = exception switch
{
ArgumentException => StatusCodes.Status400BadRequest,
_ => StatusCodes.Status500InternalServerError
};
httpContext.Response.StatusCode = status;
var problemDetails = new ProblemDetails
{
Status = status,
Title = "An error occurred",
Type = exception.GetType().Name,
Detail = exception.Message
};
await httpContext.Response.WriteAsJsonAsync(problemDetails, cancellationToken);
return true;
}
}
// In Program.cs
builder.Services.AddExceptionHandler<CustomExceptionHandler>();
Using The ProblemDetailsService
Calling AddProblemDetails
registers a default implementation of the IProblemDetailsService
. The IProblemDetailsService
will set the response status code based on the ProblemDetails.Status
.
Here's how we can use it in the CustomExceptionHandler
:
public class CustomExceptionHandler(IProblemDetailsService problemDetailsService) : IExceptionHandler
{
public async ValueTask<bool> TryHandleAsync(
HttpContext httpContext,
Exception exception,
CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
var problemDetails = new ProblemDetails
{
Status = exception switch
{
ArgumentException => StatusCodes.Status400BadRequest,
_ => StatusCodes.Status500InternalServerError
},
Title = "An error occurred",
Type = exception.GetType().Name,
Detail = exception.Message
};
return await problemDetailsService.TryWriteAsync(new ProblemDetailsContext
{
Exception = exception,
HttpContext = httpContext,
ProblemDetails = problemDetails
});
}
}
This approach seems very similar to the previous one, where we wrote to the response body. However, using the IProblemDetailsService
gives an easy way to customize all Problem Details responses.
We can return Problem Details in controllers using the Problem
method, or Results.Problem
in Minimal APIs. These methods respect the configured Problem Details customizations (more on this in the next section).
IdentityUser identityUser = new() { UserName = registerUserDto.UserName, Email = registerUserDto.Email };
IdentityResult result = await userManager.CreateAsync(identityUser, registerUserDto.Password);
if (!result.Succeeded)
{
// return Results.Problem - Minimal APIs
return Problem(
type: "Bad Request",
title: "Identity failure",
detail: result.Errors.First().Description,
statusCode: StatusCodes.Status400BadRequest);
}
Customizing Problem Details
We can pass a delegate to the AddProblemDetails
method to set the CustomizeProblemDetails
. You can use this to add extra information to all Problem Details responses.
This is an excellent place for solving cross-cutting concerns, like setting the instance
value and adding diagnostics information.
builder.Services.AddProblemDetails(options =>
{
options.CustomizeProblemDetails = context =>
{
context.ProblemDetails.Instance =
$"{context.HttpContext.Request.Method} {context.HttpContext.Request.Path}";
context.ProblemDetails.Extensions.TryAdd("requestId", context.HttpContext.TraceIdentifier);
Activity? activity = context.HttpContext.Features.Get<IHttpActivityFeature>()?.Activity;
context.ProblemDetails.Extensions.TryAdd("traceId", activity?.Id);
};
});
This customization adds the request path, a request ID, and a trace ID to every Problem Details response, enhancing debuggability and traceability of errors.
Content-Type: application/problem+json
{
"type": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc9110#section-15.5.5",
"title": "Not Found",
"status": 404,
"instance": "PUT /api/habits/aadcad3f-8dc8-443d-be44-3d99893ba18a",
"traceId": "00-63d4af1807586b0d98901ae47944192d-9a8635facb90bf76-01",
"requestId": "0HN7C8PRNMGIA:00000001"
}
You can use the traceId
to find the distributed traces and logs in a monitoring system like Seq.
Handling Specific Exceptions (Status Codes)
.NET 9 introduces a simpler way to map exceptions to status codes. Great news for fans of throwing exceptions. You can use the StatusCodeSelector
to define the mappings. This makes it easier to maintain consistent error responses across your API.
app.UseExceptionHandler(new ExceptionHandlerOptions
{
StatusCodeSelector = ex => ex switch
{
ArgumentException => StatusCodes.Status400BadRequest,
NotFoundException => StatusCodes.Status404NotFound,
_ => StatusCodes.Status500InternalServerError
}
});
If you use this together with an IExceptionHandler
that sets the StatusCode
, then the StatusCodeSelector
is ignored.
Takeaway
Implementing Problem Details in your ASP.NET Core APIs is more than just a best practice - it's a standard for improving the developer experience of your API consumers. By providing consistent, detailed, and well-structured error responses, you make it easier for clients to understand and handle error scenarios gracefully.
As you implement these practices in your own projects, you'll discover even more ways to tailor Problem Details to your specific needs. I shared what worked well for my use cases.
Problem Details is just one of the best practices covered in my upcoming RESTful APIs course. Check it out if you're looking for a comprehensive guide.
Good luck out there, and I'll see you next week.
P.S. Whenever you’re ready, there are 3 ways I can help you:
Pragmatic Clean Architecture: Join 3,050+ students in this comprehensive course that will teach you the system I use to ship production-ready applications using Clean Architecture. Learn how to apply the best practices of modern software architecture.
Modular Monolith Architecture: Join 1,000+ engineers in this in-depth course that will transform the way you build modern systems. You will learn the best practices for applying the Modular Monolith architecture in a real-world scenario.
Patreon Community: Join a community of 1,050+ engineers and software architects. You will also unlock access to the source code I use in my YouTube videos, early access to future videos, and exclusive discounts for my courses.